How Do Bots Implement?

Panorama

The new director of Panorama - George Mule - enters the scene with a run and a jump to Benigni. It is not as good as him but we all make.

speaks well of Berlusconi, Fini speaks well of, speak well of Felt, showing a large and sympathetic vision of human beings. People like us. And if one is good, is bravo. And you tell him. It also tries to give you a mission: to make peace. This, it seems, is the letter of intent.

But there's more. Panorama goes dress poker, promises to tell all the new desire to play that is rampant on the Net This is consonant with the civic duty of optimism that someone (I can not remember who) we are recommending.
Everything seems to say that with the right attitude, things are settled, as in the films of Woody Allen ("Whatever Works").

Unfortunately some of his collaborators (who anonymously, as the author of the piece on Travaglio, famous people, such as non-partisan Vespa) still do not know to play the game. Either they are bitter, such as Vespa (pardon the paradox; but have to rely on a level playing field we are a few moderates, and documented a large minority Rai ") or try to discover the altars of the false moralizing, like Marco Travaglio.

A page. 47, in fact, it appears a piece detector (sin without a signature, so we'll never know who recognize the scoop) from the promising title, "What smell money Travaglio." Readers of Panorama, we suppose, will be taken by feelings now
wonder, now with anger (dependent on par condicio Vespa) to learn that the saucy journalist has come to earn in 2007 to 350 thousand euro. "But in the last two years the company has peaked Travaglio: € 180 thousand of the copyright" ( publisher Chiarelettere for the book "Daddy") and paying it to the new Labor Padellaro newspaper, "The Fact", which becomes a shareholder.

devil of a journalist investigating anonymous. Where has found that those figures have now done to widen the nostrils voracious Ghedini lawyer? Perhaps Labor was taking advantage of the good tax amnesty in Italy to return the money greedily gained (as a parasite, say Brunetta) behind Berlusconi master?

The answer disappoints a bit '. They are all data published by the IRS and disclosed by the publisher. And a bit disappointing 'the figures. For example, less travel, work, family, contributions and employees, we do not enter the escort. And with a similar figure is not even in Puglia, neither right nor left.

Furio Colombo

Lumps Under Betwwen Your Teeth An Cheek

The legend of the premier elected by the people

of Ilvo DIAMONDS


"President elected by the people." So you define Silvio Berlusconi. Increasingly, for some time. To claim compliance with the many enemies that besiege him. But at the same time, to mark the distances on the other chair. Giorgio Napolitano. The President of the Republic. The latter, by contrast, is "elected by Parliament." In fact one part of it. Napolitano Why is not "impartial", but left. Like all other state institutions. Constitutional Court and the judiciary in the head. Not guaranteed. But political actors. Part. This is why Mr Berlusconi does not accept the decisions, but neither the role. In practice: consider the institutions of state - and therefore the Constitution - inadequate. Worse unlawful. Less legitimate him, anyhow. President elected by the people.

These statements, supported by hot and warm premier, after the Constitutional Court ruling on the immunity law, are based on questionable assumptions, primarily in terms of facts. Taken for granted. That are not discounted.

The first fact is that Berlusconi is a president "elected by the people." Is at least doubtful. Why Italy is not (yet) a presidential system. The citizens, voters vote for a party or a coalition. Not directly the premier or president. Although, after 1994, we have witnessed a gradual twist of electoral rules and institutional sense "personal." Without the need for reform. Thus, in the ballot, along with parties and coalitions is also referred to the candidate for prime minister. (As he complained, often, Giovanni Sartori). However, you do not vote directly for prime minister, but political parties and coalitions. Silvio Berlusconi, for this is not a president elected by "the people". If anything, the "People of Freedom." A majority of voters, however, very relative.


the general elections of 2008 the party of which Berlusconi is the leader, the PDL has, in fact, obtained 37.4% of valid votes, but 35.9% of voters and 28.9% of claimants. Around one third of the "people", in short. However, before joining with An, until 2006, Berlusconi's party was Forza Italy, which has never exceeded 30% of the votes (valid). The result of the PDL must, of course, add 10% (or 8%, depending on the chosen constituency) obtained by the League. Whose voters, however, did not vote for Berlusconi. Given that the Northern League has stolen votes in the PDL, which is an ally and competitor. And when he attended the Government (as at this stage) has always sought to "Opposition". This consideration becomes even more evident if one refers to the result of recent European. Where he voted with the proportional and personal preferences. The Pdl, Berlusconi's party, has obtained 35.3% of valid votes, but 33% of voters and 21.9% of those eligible. He, the President has personally received 2,700,000 preference. 25% of the votes of the PDL, but less than 9% of voters. The result of "personal" more limited, since 1994.
All this, of course, does not affect the legitimacy of the government and the Prime Minister. If anything, his claim to interpret the "will of the people."

Moreover, you vote once every five years, while the surveys are made nearly every day. So, rather than on voting, the consensus tends to be based on the opinions. On the "trust". But estimating the "confidence" of citizens is a difficult and questionable. Which does not coincide with the electoral support. You do not understand it otherwise, because, if indeed - as claimed by Berlusconi - 70% of Italians have confidence in him, to the recent European elections, the PDL has stood at 35%, the coalition government at 45% and personal preferences for Premier 9% (of the valid votes).

Trust is also difficult to measure. For substantive reasons, but also methodological. Especially through the polls. Depends on the questions posed to respondents. Indices that are used. Some of the main institutions opinion polling (as Nando Pagnoncelli Ipsos Ispo and Renato Mannheimer) use a scale of 1 to 10, by analogy to the school vote. So the area of \u200b\u200b"trust" includes all those who give to a leader (or institution) the sufficiency (and thus at least 6). Today, according to this index, approximately 50% of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi expressed confidence in the (estimated by Ipsos and ISPO, in this regard, they converge). While in late April, after the earthquake in Italy, exceeded 60%. This means that in recent months, the "trust" the people in the prime minister has declined, although it is still very wide. However, even accepting these indices, a 6 can really be considered a sign of "trust"? In my day, in primary schools - but also in high school - was a sufficiently close. 18 As a university. Whether you agree not to repeat the exam. But it remains a mediocre rating. Just raise the threshold, even a very short, just one point. Increased to 7. To see the confidence in the Prime Minister (and all the other leaders) down considerably. To 37%. Much like the votes of the PDL. With these data and with these measures is the bold claim of the prime minister to speak on "behalf of the people." Especially since, by any yardstick, the personal consent to the President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano, is much higher. Until a week ago, before the recent controversy, expressing confidence in it about 80% of Italian, using the vote 6. More than 50%, with a far more demanding: 7. The same level of consensus collected by his predecessor, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi. Also from what the originators of the growing tensions between Prime Minister and the President of the Republic. In the era of democracy to the public. Majority and personalized. Where the media have become the most important public space. And the consensus is measured by surveys. No one is "super partes". They are all "part." All competitors. Opponents or allies. Friends or enemies. Even Napolitano, especially Napolitano. For the position it occupies and the confidence you get. In the eyes of Berlusconi, pledged to build the legend of "the President and voted by the people wanted." Can not Friend appear.

Free Room Rental Agreement Uk

naz Association. Alpine opens in Bucharest

inaugurated in Bucharest, an office of An , the National Association Alpine

to promote the initiative and 'in particular was the Ana Palmanova (Udine), where a delegation and 'went over the weekend in Romania together with the national president of the association, Corrado Perona.

The Alpini were also visiting the Greeks in the province of Tulcea, where there is talk of Veneto and Friuli, to meet the heirs of Italians who emigrated more than 'a hundred years ago