involving everyone, absolutely everyone, from Fini Vendola (and indeed
Grillo) in the presence of the electoral system (if it changes,
also change the subject, of course), would unleash a sea of \u200b\u200bcontroversy. Most
pats on the Web, are unequivocal: "Shame!" And "Call an ambulance
. I try to respond rationally.
My conclusion was based on two fundamental premises:
1) if Berlusconi wins again, takes no prisoners and establish a true dictatorship.
2) This is dictatorship qualitatively different (and worse) from the traditional worst misrule and also by the Berlusconi regime.
To avoid my conclusion must therefore be argued that
at least one of the premises is false. If one does it is useless in gutting
insults.
First, we have an impressive array of empirical evidence
that underpins it. If Berlusconi wins
becomes President of the Republic in 2013, the two judges who choose to check the missing
the Constitutional Court (unless he is unable even before) removes
the autonomy of the judiciary (that remains of it), closes the newspapers that publish news
uncomfortable, even change to Rule 1 (which is not
ever made!), the police will no longer be subject to
pm and will investigate according to the desired of 'Executive, trade unions will be destroyed as the Fiom, the TV will only Minzolini and Corona and all ... This is to begin.
is why I have called "deadly" this looming tomorrow Berlusconi.
What I think (and we're in step 2) also
chilling prospect than the smelly and disgusting regime of today.
a government of liberation from that nightmare might perpetuate
without the Berlusconi Berlusconi, of course, but the difference continues to look abysmal:
now a system where it is still possible to fight legally, tomorrow a
criccofascismo , that is a true fascist style
even if unpublished. Of course the difference is less
if someone is convinced that (many) independent judges, (some)
unions still free, (some) journalists still dedicated to the truth
in fact, are irrelevant to the fact that more and capitalist exploitation
it is, if it is not soup pan is wet. These equations
I will willingly leave to Toni Negri and their
"thought harmless.
Now if fourth victory of Berlusconi
means the prospect of a dictatorship through the courts - and I have not read
credible arguments to the contrary - it is clear that
would be a "shame", or the behavior of a "call the 'ambulance' means any
choice that does not prevent it. But the current electoral law states that the list
takes everything that comes first. It follows that it takes to beat Berlusconi
a coalition that will ensure we get one vote more than his
. Can give only a coalition of center? If the risk was
five years as those already passed,
perspective would be nauseating but you could run it. If the risk is
dictatorship, however, we can not run without the
irresponsible. The certainty would succeed alliance with Pd Casini (and maybe Montezemolo)
as hope and Cacciari Chiamparino? Worse than go at night,
defections of voters who remain at home would be multiplied.
But the same thing would happen to an alliance fine to Vendola , someone will object. Take the abacus. Hic stantibus rebus
face B. and B. comes to 40%, while 60% opposed. To lose
should pay the price of one vote out of three. This
yes that is unlikely. Especially as I have pointed out as absolutely necessary
a list (or more) of people without party affiliation, which would increase the total
.
a government of liberation could last long?
No. But the argument can not be because this is not the problem
. If the fourth victory of Berlusconi
you establish a legal dictatorship, you need a government that destroys the abnormal set of
powers that enabled the birth of the regime, in addition to
withdrawal of ad personam laws. Without them, without
property on the Bulgarian TV, with the constraints of a strict law on conflict
of interests, Berlusconi is politically finished forever, because
structurally.
finished with him the nightmare of dictatorship
legalized, we would still face - is obvious - all the problems of a democracy
sick of enormous injustice and
rubble, even anthropological, that Berlusconi Berlusconi
bequeaths . It would start very soon a clash between without Berlusconi Berlusconi democracy and consistent
(passing through all intermediate ranges). But the dictatorship
is another thing, the criccofascismo is another thing. Only avert this looming
probability, one can expect to revive a policy of
left, inspired by the shareholder to "justice and freedom." If Berlusconi wins
for the fourth time, however, no one can write programs to five stars or fight for the workers of Pomigliano .
Can it be so difficult to understand? Our grandparents (for my generation
. Grandparents for the younger readers) have the same illusions lulled
with Mussolini.
possible that the desire to repeat mistakes already made is so irresistible?
Done The Daily, November 26, 2010